Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Apple denies iPhone tracking claims

iphone Don't follow me ... Apple says that it does not track the location of a user's iPhone and 'has never done so'. Photograph: Linda Nylind for the Guardian

Apple has admitted that a bug in its software has allowed iPhones and iPads to collect data related to their location even when users turn off permission to collect it – but says it will soon remedy this oversight.

The admission follows a storm of controversy after the Guardian's exclusive revelation last week that the devices stored a file containing details from which a user's movements could be reconstructed.

In a statement on its website, the company says that: "Apple is not tracking the location of your iPhone. Apple has never done so and has no plans ever to do so."

It says that the file discovered by researchers and described in the Guardian is not used for tracking of the phone or its owner. "The location data that researchers are seeing on the iPhone is not the past or present location of the iPhone, but rather the locations of Wi-Fi hotspots and [mobile network] cell towers surrounding the iPhone's location, which can be more than 100 miles away from the iPhone." It adds: "We plan to cease backing up this cache in a software update coming soon."

That will cut the amount of data stored from as much as a year's worth of location information to just seven days, the company says. That is likely to be roughly comparable with the store used on Android phones, which record the past 50 cell towers and 200 Wi-Fi networks that the phone has "seen".

That data is uploaded to Apple in an "encrypted and anonymous" form, it says.

It admits that a software fault means that if users turn off Location Services – which should prevent the upload – the data is still sent. "It shouldn't. This is a bug, which we plan to fix shortly," the company says.

Future versions of the file will be encrypted on the phone. That will allay fears that law enforcement and security services could copy the file and analyse it without a valid warrant.

Apple accepts some of the blame for the concern over the revelations, which have seen it threatened with lawsuits and put under focus from US lawmakers and potentially by European governments. "Providing mobile users with fast and accurate location information while preserving their security and privacy has raised some very complex technical issues which are hard to communicate in a soundbite. Users are confused, partly because the creators of this new technology (including Apple) have not provided enough education about these issues to date," the company says in its statement.

The data is stored because it helps the iPhone to calculate its location, Apple says. "Calculating a phone's location using just GPS satellite data can take up to several minutes. iPhone can reduce this time to just a few seconds by using Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data to quickly find GPS satellites, and even triangulate its location using just Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data when GPS is not available (such as indoors or in basements). These calculations are performed live on the iPhone using a crowd-sourced database of Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data that is generated by tens of millions of iPhones sending the geo-tagged locations of nearby Wi-Fi hotspots and cell towers in an anonymous and encrypted form to Apple."

Apple also insists that it cannot identify individuals from the data because the data about networks and Wi-Fi – which is reported to the company's servers – is anonymised and encrypted.

The Guardian approached Apple ahead of publication last week of its article detailing the findings by the researchers, but the company declined to comment at the time. Repeated requests for comment received no response until now.

Since then Apple has found itself under fire, with the US Democratic senator Al Franken writing directly to Apple chief executive Steve Jobs demanding to know why the phones retained the data, and attempts to file a class action lawsuit against the company.

Jobs himself was curtly emphatic in an email earlier this week in which he insisted "we don't track anyone" and that "the info circulating around is false".



View the original article here

READ MORE » Apple denies iPhone tracking claims

Apple Responds To Location Tracking Kerfuffle, Says It’s Innocent, Blames Bugs

Apple aims to – finally – set the record straight about the gathering and use of location information by iOS devices. The entire Q&A can be found below.

Apple starts off by stating that it has never tracked, and will never track the location of a customer’s iPhone. The company goes on to say it’s partly to blame for any ‘confusion’ about it, though, because users haven’t been ‘educated’ to fully understand the technical issues with providing mobile users with fast and accurate location information.

That said, the company did identify several ‘bugs’ which it says it will fix shortly.

As we posited earlier, Apple says it’s merely maintaining a crowd-sourced database of Wi-Fi hotspots and cell towers around your current location that is generated by tens of millions of iPhones sending geo-tagged locations, both anonymously and encrypted.

According to the Cupertino company, the location data that researchers spotted on the iPhone is not the past or present location of the iPhone, but rather the locations of Wi-Fi hotspots and cell towers surrounding the iPhone’s location, which it adds can be more than one hundred miles away from the device in question.

Apple says it simply can not identify the source of this data (i.e. your location).

Nevertheless, the company says it will release a free iOS software update sometime in the next few weeks that reduces the size of the Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower database cached on the iPhone, start encrypting and refrain from backing up this cache and delete it entirely when Location Services is turned off by the user.

Apple admits that this storing the cache for such a long time was a bug that will be fixed, ultimately recognizing that this was a valid source for concern. Another bug resulted in the iPhone continually updating its Wi-Fi and cell tower data from Apple’s crowd-sourced database even after the user turned off Location Services on his phone.

Earlier this week, a class action suit was filed, accusing Apple of invasion of privacy and computer fraud and of “secretly recording movements of iPhone and iPad users.”

French, German, Italian and South Korean regulators had also started investigating the alleged location collection feature on Apple devices following publication of the researchers report.

Does Apple’s response sound credible to you?

Apple Q&A on Location Data:

1. Why is Apple tracking the location of my iPhone?

Apple is not tracking the location of your iPhone. Apple has never done so and has no plans to ever do so.

2. Then why is everyone so concerned about this?

Providing mobile users with fast and accurate location information while preserving their security and privacy has raised some very complex technical issues which are hard to communicate in a soundbite. Users are confused, partly because the creators of this new technology (including Apple) have not provided enough education about these issues to date.

3. Why is my iPhone logging my location?

The iPhone is not logging your location. Rather, it’s maintaining a database of Wi-Fi hotspots and cell towers around your current location, some of which may be located more than one hundred miles away from your iPhone, to help your iPhone rapidly and accurately calculate its location when requested. Calculating a phone’s location using just GPS satellite data can take up to several minutes. iPhone can reduce this time to just a few seconds by using Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data to quickly find GPS satellites, and even triangulate its location using just Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data when GPS is not available (such as indoors or in basements). These calculations are performed live on the iPhone using a crowd-sourced database of Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data that is generated by tens of millions of iPhones sending the geo-tagged locations of nearby Wi-Fi hotspots and cell towers in an anonymous and encrypted form to Apple.

4. Is this crowd-sourced database stored on the iPhone?

The entire crowd-sourced database is too big to store on an iPhone, so we download an appropriate subset (cache) onto each iPhone. This cache is protected but not encrypted, and is backed up in iTunes whenever you back up your iPhone. The backup is encrypted or not, depending on the user settings in iTunes. The location data that researchers are seeing on the iPhone is not the past or present location of the iPhone, but rather the locations of Wi-Fi hotspots and cell towers surrounding the iPhone’s location, which can be more than one hundred miles away from the iPhone. We plan to cease backing up this cache in a software update coming soon (see Software Update section below).

5. Can Apple locate me based on my geo-tagged Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data?

No. This data is sent to Apple in an anonymous and encrypted form. Apple cannot identify the source of this data.

6. People have identified up to a year’s worth of location data being stored on the iPhone. Why does my iPhone need so much data in order to assist it in finding my location today?

This data is not the iPhone’s location data—it is a subset (cache) of the crowd-sourced Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower database which is downloaded from Apple into the iPhone to assist the iPhone in rapidly and accurately calculating location. The reason the iPhone stores so much data is a bug we uncovered and plan to fix shortly (see Software Update section below). We don’t think the iPhone needs to store more than seven days of this data.

7. When I turn off Location Services, why does my iPhone sometimes continue updating its Wi-Fi and cell tower data from Apple’s crowd-sourced database?

It shouldn’t. This is a bug, which we plan to fix shortly (see Software Update section below).

8. What other location data is Apple collecting from the iPhone besides crowd-sourced Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower data?

Apple is now collecting anonymous traffic data to build a crowd-sourced traffic database with the goal of providing iPhone users an improved traffic service in the next couple of years.

9. Does Apple currently provide any data collected from iPhones to third parties?

We provide anonymous crash logs from users that have opted in to third-party developers to help them debug their apps. Our iAds advertising system can use location as a factor in targeting ads. Location is not shared with any third party or ad unless the user explicitly approves giving the current location to the current ad (for example, to request the ad locate the Target store nearest them).

10. Does Apple believe that personal information security and privacy are important?

Yes, we strongly do. For example, iPhone was the first to ask users to give their permission for each and every app that wanted to use location. Apple will continue to be one of the leaders in strengthening personal information security and privacy.

Software Update

Sometime in the next few weeks Apple will release a free iOS software update that:

- reduces the size of the crowd-sourced Wi-Fi hotspot and cell tower database cached on the iPhone,
- ceases backing up this cache, and
- deletes this cache entirely when Location Services is turned off.

In the next major iOS software release the cache will also be encrypted on the iPhone.

READ MORE » Apple Responds To Location Tracking Kerfuffle, Says It’s Innocent, Blames Bugs

Gareth Edwards: 'With Apple it's my way or the highway'

Gareth Edwards director of Monsters Gareth Edwards ... internet user, Apple abuser. Photograph: Matt Carr/Getty Images

What's your favourite piece of technology, and how has it improved your life?
I'm one of these people who's frustrated because we don't have jet packs and don't live on the moon. The promise of science fiction and the technology we were going to get just hasn't manifested, with the exception of two – mobile phones and the internet. The idea that all computers are connected and all knowledge is in one place is amazing. What's brilliant about it is that we take it for granted.

When was the last time you used the internet, and what for?
Technically speaking, this morning to use a map on my phone.

Do you think it will be obsolete in 10 years' time?
No, computers are now all connected together – it's just going to go from strength to strength.

What always frustrates you about technology in general?
It doesn't work when it's supposed to. And it's often designed by engineers, because it has to be, and not the kind of person who has to use it. I wish there was more of a connection sometimes.

Mac or PC, and why?
PC, because they were the only computer that could do 3D software for a while, and it's better the devil you know. Also, I think that a Mac is quite fascist, in that "it's my way or the highway".

What piece of technology would you most like to own?
If there was some sort of device that could make you immortal, then that would be the best thing.

Gareth Edwards's debut feature film, Monsters, is out now on Blu-ray and DVD



View the original article here

READ MORE » Gareth Edwards: 'With Apple it's my way or the highway'

iPhones and Android phones building vast databases for Google and Apple

iphone privacy location fears iPhones and Android phones send back data about the locations of the users to the technology companies. Photograph: Brendan Mcdermid/Reuters

Apple and Google are using smartphones running their software to build gigantic databases for location-based services, according to new research following the Guardian's revelations that iPhones and devices running Android collect location data about owners' movements.

iPhones and Android smartphones swap data – which does not contain information directly identifying the user or the phone – back and forth with their respective companies if the user agrees to use "location services".

The news has led some European governments to announce investigations into whether Apple is breaking privacy laws.

Samy Kamkar, a hacker and researcher, has shown that Android phones, which run on software written by Google, collect the location data every few seconds and store it in a local file, but also transmit it to Google several times an hour.

This functionality is almost certainly used in any phone that provides mapping services, meaning that similar files will exist in some form on all smartphones, including those from Nokia and BlackBerry-maker RIM. It is not known whether these models synchronise data from the phone to the companies' servers as well as storing it locally on the handset.

Sources familiar with Google's systems said the location data was used to help the phones orient themselves by identifying nearby mobile phone masts and wi-fi sources and comparing them with Google's own database, with which they are synchronised continually. The file is also updated so that if the mobile signal is interrupted – for example when the user is on a train and goes into a tunnel – it will be able to re-establish contact more quickly by knowing which towers are in the vicinity.

Apple and Google are collecting the data, which amounts to an international map of the locations and unique identities of cell towers and wi-fi networks, to improve targeting of their adverts based around mobile phones.

In a letter to the US congress last July, Apple confirmed it collected the data and said that, in order to be useful, "the databases [of tower and network locations] must be updated continuously".

The value of location-based services, which feature advertising, is reckoned to be $2.9bn (£1.75bn) already and forecast by the research group Gartner to grow to $8.3bn by 2014.

In 2009, Google itself pointed to the value for users of having Android phones upload real-time location data to its servers, suggesting it could give "a pretty good picture of live traffic conditions". It said: "We continuously combine this data and send it back to you for free in the Google Maps traffic layers. It takes almost zero effort on your part – just turn on Google Maps for mobile before starting your car."

A Google spokesman said Android phones explicitly asked to collect anonymous location data when users turned them on.

Apple iPhones and iPads also ask whether users want to have "location services" turned on, and the iPhone licence has a passage that says Apple "and its partners and licensees" may transmit, collect, maintain, process and use location data, including the real-time geographic location of the iPhone, though it points out that this is anonymised and can be disabled by turning off the "location services" feature.

However, even if users disable location services, the iPhone and Android phones are believed to continue storing locations of cell towers and wi-fi networks in what is known as a "neighbour list".

Google's list is limited to the most recent 50 cell masts and 200 wi-fi networks, while Apple's list is retained for up to a year. Sources close to Apple have suggested the long-term retention may be an error which it will correct in a future software update.

Privacy advocates fear that although the data is anonymised, the Apple data is not encrypted and could be misused by law enforcement or others who wanted to capture information about someone's movements.

One security researcher, Alex Levinson of Katana Forensics, said on Thursday that US law enforcement had already made use of the location data recorded by the iPhone in investigations.

Some police forces, such as those in Michigan, already carry readers that can copy all the files from a smartphone even if it is protected with a password, and that it has been used on motorists stopped for minor traffic violations. The American Civil Liberties Union says such examination amounts to an "unreasonable search", which would be illegal in the US.

In Germany, the Bavarian Agency for the Supervision of Data Protection said it would examine whether and why Apple's devices were capturing the information, and that it had asked Apple for more information.

"If it is true that this information is being collected... without the approval and knowledge of the users, then it is definitely a violation of German privacy law," Thomas Kranig, the agency's director, told the New York Times.

Italy and France are expected to do the same. France's data protection authority suggested that a major source of concern would be over whether Apple transferred any of the data to any commercial partners. "If the information is marketed without the knowledge of the consumer, it is much more serious," Yann Padova of France's CNIL said.

• This article was amended on 22 April 2011. The previous version stated that some European governments had announced investigations into whether both companies are breaking privacy laws



View the original article here

READ MORE » iPhones and Android phones building vast databases for Google and Apple

Samsung counter-sues Apple over battle for £100bn smartphone industry

Samsung Samsung's rise in the smartphone market is 'quite threatening' to Apple, says one analyst. Photograph: Lee Jin-Man/AP

Samsung Electronics has hit back against Apple with a tit-for-tat lawsuit a week after the US group accused its South Korean rival of "slavishly" copying designs of its iPhone and iPad.

Samsung filed suits against Apple in South Korea, Japan and Germany on Friday, alleging infringement of 10 patents in areas such as data transmission and wireless technology.

The move comes days before it launches a new version of its Galaxy S smartphone, and is the first against Apple, its biggest client as well as a rival. The South Korean electronics maker supplies Apple with microchips, memory chips and other parts. Analysts say Apple would struggle to find a supplier of the same calibre.

Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablet computers, which use Google's Android operating system, have emerged as the main competitors to Apple's iPhone and iPad. Apple sold 18.6m iPhones in the last quarter, while Samsung has startled rivals with the rapid growth of its smartphone sales and is estimated to have shifted 13m handsets between January and March. It aims to sell 60m smartphones this year.

"Apple is quite annoyed by Samsung's fast rise in a market which it virtually created," James Song, an analyst at Daewoo Securities, said. "It's quite threatening to see how quickly Samsung plays catch-up, and Apple might have felt a strong urge to put a brake on its march just when Samsung is set to roll out a new smartphone in May ahead of its new iPhone."

Samsung said on Friday that it was "responding actively to the legal action taken against us in order to protect our intellectual property".Apple filed a lawsuit against Samsung a week ago, claiming that its Galaxy design features copy the iPhone and iPad. Its spokeswoman Kristin Huguet said then: "This kind of blatant copying is wrong." The US company brought 16 claims against Samsung, including unjust enrichment, trademark infringement and 10 patent claims. But Samsung insists that the design of its products is the result of its own research and development.

The lawsuits are the latest in the fiercely competitive £100bn smartphone industry. Nokia has sued Apple, while the US company has brought suits against handset makers HTC and Motorola alleging patent infringement.

The global smartphone market is set to grow by 58% this year, with Android devices expected to grow strongly, according to research firm Gartner. It estimates that the tablet market could quadruple to 70m units. The iPad will dominate in coming years, but its market share is expected to be eroded by Android devices and could fall from 69% this year to 47% in 2015.

This year phone companies will struggle to obtain components after the Japanese earthquake led to factory closures. Experts say smartphone sales could drop by up to 5% as a result. Nokia, BlackBerry maker Research in Motion and Sony Ericsson are affected by supply shortages, while others including Apple, Samsung, HTC and China's Huawei are thought to have acted quickly to secure supplies from China, Taiwan and Korea instead.



View the original article here

READ MORE » Samsung counter-sues Apple over battle for £100bn smartphone industry

Apple Sues Samsung, Claims Its Android Devices Are Copycats

The Wall Street Journal reports that Apple has just filed another lawsuit in its legal crusade against Android: a ‘look and feel’ complaint against Samsung phones including the Galaxy S 4G, Epic 4G, Galaxy Tab, and Nexus S, that have allegedly copied “Apple’s technology, user interface and innovative style”. The suit was filed in the Northern District of California on April 15. The fact that the Nexus S is included is important, as this features Google’s stock build of Android 2.3.

And, as the report notes, Samsung is actually a chip supplier for Apple products.

This is only the latest attack in Apple’s war against phone manufacturers who have created popular Android devices.

In March 2010, Apple launched a patent infringement case against HTC that went for the jugular: it cited infringements on “20 Apple patents related to the iPhone’s user interface, underlying architecture and hardware”. The suit was a clear attack on Android (many of HTC’s most popular devices run Google’s mobile OS), and Google was quick to say that it had HTC’s back.

Because the suit was filed with the International Trade Commission, an Apple victory could mean that infringing HTC devices are banned from importation in the US. This morning, the staff of the ITC announced that it recommended against siding with Apple. This is pleasant news for HTC and Android fans, but it doesn’t actually have any consequence — this was just a staff recommendation, and it’s still up to the judge to decide whether or not to ban HTC devices.

And Apple isn’t the only one looking to fend off Android with lawsuits. Microsoft has filed suit against Motorola claiming nine cases of patent infringement (and got HTC to license its patents, likely to avoid a legal dispute).

READ MORE » Apple Sues Samsung, Claims Its Android Devices Are Copycats

Greenpeace Ranks Data Centers, Names Yahoo Cleanest And Apple The Dirtest

Greenpeace just released its latest snapshot of major corporation’s impact on the planet with IT data centers the main target. The 35 page report [PDF link] details just how much energy is required to run the massive centers powering the so-called cloud. It’s huge according to Greenpeace, consuming 1.5%-2% of the world’s total power consumption and growing at a rate of 12% a year. Somewhat surprisingly Greenpeace sort of applauds the virtues of living in a massive data cloud, pointing to the advent of the smart grid and increased amount telecommuting. Even digital streaming music gets props for having a smaller carbon footprint than physical media.


But this is Greenpeace and so there has to be some finger pointing and letter grading. The main purpose of this report is to reveal top company’s impact on the environment by mainly examining their dependency on fossil and nuclear fuels rather than using renewable sources. However, even Greenpeace notes that these numbers might not be exact since they were calculated without all the facts. Simply put, these ten companies didn’t divulge this info; Greenpeace pieced together their data. It’s a bit dirty itself, actually.


 


READ MORE » Greenpeace Ranks Data Centers, Names Yahoo Cleanest And Apple The Dirtest